Hello, Xaedra, and welcome to the Fallout Wiki! Thank you for your contributions, and we hope you'll stay with us and make many more.
Some links you may find useful:
- Recent changes lets you see what other people are editing currently and where you can help. You can also check our community portal for things to do.
- If you haven't already, create a user page about yourself. If you do, we'll be able to know you better as a member of our community.
- If you are new to wikis, the help pages can help you learn how to edit and how use the wiki tools. For test edits, feel free to create a personal sandbox.
- Nukapedia's policies and guidelines describe how we do things around here and can help you make even better contributions.
If you have questions, you can ask in our forums, join the live chat or post a message on my talk page. We hope you enjoy editing here and look forward to working with you!
exploits
Instead of reverting my edit and still removing the entries in question, please learn to follow the rules and edit according to the guidelines. Also leaving snide remarks in the edit summary is not advisable.--Kingclyde 03:40, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Sorry I wasn't trying to be snide, my point was just that there has to be some cut off for what is considered an exploit. I re-edited the page so it contains a link to the console commands page. IMO it would help keep the exploit page cleaner if the console commands were elaborated on further in their own page (seeing as the exploit page is already quite lengthy). If you don't agree I'm willing to keep them in but would you mind if I made a different section in that page for them?--Xaedra 06:42, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Also as a sort of offhand note, I think part of the reason I was upset was because all of my changes were reverted, not just the deletion of the console command. Did you have issue with those changes or did they all just get lumped into on undo? I'm not absolutely sure how the undo works. Did it just revert all my publishes on that page?--Xaedra 06:44, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
(Sorry I keep forgetting to sign these things.)
policy
Also before "qouting policy" on talk pages, please realize that this is not wiki and out rules vary from theirs. We are a wikia site. Please review the policies and guidelines in the link from your welcome message.--Kingclyde 03:41, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Before getting onto me about quoting policy, perhaps you would do well to actually check policy and make sure I'm in the wrong? In case you were wondering, I'm not: "Fallout Wiki uses all of the same writing conventions found in the Wikipedia:Manual of Style.". Best I can say is... check your sources?--Xaedra 06:10, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
Kingclyde knows what he's talking about. He's the head bureaucrat of the Wiki, meaning he's the one who all the administrators report to. 
06:12, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
- I'd advise for you to stop being such a smart-ass. Especially to the 'crat of Nukapedia. Acting all high-and-mighty won't get you far here.
Skål! 06:13, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Aside him being a bureaucrat, don't be rude to people offering you help. No matter who.-- 06:15, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Aside him being a bureaucrat, don't be rude to people offering you help. No matter who.--
- Not being a smart-ass, just saying I read the policy. If there's a legitimate concern regarding any changes I make, I am more than willing to discuss them. If I leave a comment on the talk page after being reverted, I'd rather a constructive discussion rather than some message telling me to quick leaving comments on talk.--Xaedra 06:23, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
- There's a difference between correcting someone's mistake and talking down to them because of said mistake. While you were right, you worded your rebuttal in a way that's not acceptable. Skål! 06:29, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
- There's a difference between correcting someone's mistake and talking down to them because of said mistake. While you were right, you worded your rebuttal in a way that's not acceptable.
Sorry I wasn't meaning to be argumentative or demeaning (I know I come off that way, I don't really mean it I'm just kinda blunt sometimes, sometimes to the point of being rude.). It just seemed unfair that all my edits were reverted when he had issue with only one of my edits. I just wanted more clarification and discussion, I probably could have talked nicer though.--Xaedra 06:38, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Thank you for understanding. Just explain yourself as neutrally as possible if someone has a concern over your work. Being rude, even unintentionally, will just result in others not taking you seriously and will affect how people judge your edits. Skål! 06:36, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
I understand. It's a personality thing, but I'll work on it. I honestly do just want to help clean up some of these lengthier pages.
- Glad to hear it. That sort of attitude will be welcomed with open arms. Skål! 06:39, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
TES
I must be playing MW3 too much. :P I keep reading your name as "Daedra". 
Skål! 07:29, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
- Lol haven't played yet it any good?--Xaedra 07:32, February 5, 2012 (UTC)
Infobox
I'm impressed with your infobox. However, the information content didn't add any information that wasn't already unknown. Basically you put that it works for all. If a couple didn't count towards it, you could have put it in a note.--
07:31, February 5, 2012 (UTC)