We've Moved! Just as Gamepedia has joined forces with Fandom, this wiki had joined forces with our Fandom equivalent. The wiki has been archived and we ask that readers and editors move to the now combined wiki on Fandom. Click to go to the new wiki.

The Vault talk:File maintenance project

From The Vault - Fallout Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search

Oh boy, this project is going to be a doozy for the core games.

I will join this project, as I intend to upload new and improved pictures for nearly every single Fallout and Fallout 2 non-player character. I will add the list of photos for each game on the project page when I find the time. -- Ghouly89 (Talk) 02:15, May 16, 2010 (UTC)

Thanks for your participation Ghouly! Your help with the Fallout 1 and 2 files (and listings) would be greatly appreciated. Thanks :)   phoenix  txt  Mini-FO3 Logo2.png 09:45, May 20, 2010 (UTC)
I will likely be working on the Fallout 2 section, glad to see that none of my previous uploads made it into the "needs to be fixed" list :P Glancing through the list though, I don't see the problem with some of these images. For example: File:Fo2_John_Bishop.png, File:FO2_NewReno_AngelaBishop.PNG, File:FO2_VC_HappyHarry.PNG --Pongsifu 01:08, December 26, 2010 (UTC)

"Image in use"- Forums?

The Fawkes images that I had marked 'no' for are in use in a forum topic. Would that count as the image being used? The screenshots are about the alternate ending where Fawkes can start the purifier, which has been described in the articles. I mean, the screenshots aren't that great, but they do show the dialogue between the PC and Fawkes. However, that is described in the article also and the forum is from a long time ago. My main question is that if that warrants a 'yes' marking in the usage collumn. Metalspork talk  contribs 19:15, May 19, 2010 (UTC)

From an article perspective, no is probably fine. However, as an alternative use is being made of the images, they wouldn't be tagged with {{unused}}. In the event they were only being used on a Userpage, then changing the files category to [[Category:User page images]] would be in order. Any images posted as forum items (particularly over 3 months old) that are over 500k filesize should probably be tagged with {{badimage|excessive filesize}}. Thanks for your ongoing efforts :)   phoenix  txt  Mini-FO3 Logo2.png 09:45, May 20, 2010 (UTC)

In-game screenshots preferred?

I came across the American Grease-Monkey page and it said that an in-game image was preferred. Should I take that into account while marking images for improvement? Images like Elliot Tercorien also have the transparent background that isn't from an in-game screenshot. Metalspork talk  contribs 00:31, May 28, 2010 (UTC)

Well, I think that generic characters should have the transparent background, while Elliot should have a background, to put emphasis on the fact that generic characters are generic. Nitty Tok. 00:34, May 28, 2010 (UTC)
Taking the approach where the following randomly generated character pages have in-game representative images rather than ones sourced from GECK; Wasteland Doctor, Survivor, Wastelander, The Surgeon etc. With the exception of faction pages (or non-PC ones such as armor, weapons, world objects etc), I do have a preference for in-game images. For consistency, a decision would be a good idea.   phoenix  txt  Mini-FO3 Logo2.png 09:17, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

I personally think in-game images look better. The only images that I like with transparent backgrounds are images of objects, since that usually makes them easier to see... Plus, deciding who was generic enough for a transparent image would be kind of difficult, and I think it would take more effort to get more transparent images than to replace the transparent ones, since there aren't that many. Metalspork talk  contribs 17:50, May 29, 2010 (UTC)

So... Transparent images...

We didn't really reach a consensus on the transparent images taken from the GECK. There are lots of these in the Operation: Anchorage images, which I have just gone through and added summaries to. If you guys would rather have non-transparent images, I will tag them, but otherwise I can just leave them as they are. After looking at them more I feel neutral about it, so it just depends on if everyone else feels that they should be in-game images or if GECK images are okay. Metalspork (word vomit) 02:32, June 14, 2010 (UTC)


I believe that if a file was uploaded less than 2 weeks ago it should not be marked for deletion. The reason I say this is because what if someone uploaded those pics for their user page and then went on vacation. Just a thought.--Kingclyde 02:49, January 10, 2011 (UTC)