Fallout Wiki
Advertisement
Fallout Wiki
Forums: Index > Wiki proposals and applications > Administator Request - ToCxHawK

Yo yo yo, it's yo boi Hawk a.k.a Tacohawk b.k.a Hawk da Barber here to ask you, my people for a chance to become admin.

Yo, Hawk, Why do you think you deserve adminship?

Well, I've been here for almost a year now, and though I didn't start editing till late last year, I was always checking for vandals and reverting their edits just like everyone else so I'm not special for that in the least. I guess I can say that I've been a good force in the chat which means nothing when it comes to expanding the wiki to it's fullest potential. I've help majorly when it comes to editing Van Buren pages, adding info to tons of pages that were just sitting there collecting dust. I've also helped quite a bit on the Bug Verification along with my boy Toci, spending hours verifying bugs and removing them. I've also done a microscopic amount of the Van Buren Qutation Blitz.

Contributions

  • Completed the Mesa Verde Design Document - quests, adding all the info and walkthrough. Adding info to characters. Fixing and adding info on the locations.
  • Made a few character pages for Van Buren characters.
  • Blackfoot quest pages, adding info. - Still in progress.
  • Verifying Bugs for BVP.

Edit Count

There should have been a list of this user's edit counts here, but the edit counts feature is no longer available.

Votes

  • Yes Because you told me to vote no, so I purposely do the opposite just to piss you off. Yes Man defaultUser Avatar talk 03:37, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • Yes I hoped there would never be a Joe Budden fan as an admin, but oh well. User Broccoli Broccoli. 03:39, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • Yes Of course, great contributer and moderator, deserves a spot. --    Contr        KOROMO        Talk      03:41, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • Yes Nice fella, positive presence on chat, solid contributions (especially on Van Buren articles), so I think he deserves it. --Crimson Frankie -ArroyoTalk 04:10, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • No Sorry, you do not meet the personal requirements that I've placed for Admins, starting with edit count. I won't even consider an applicant unless they have 2000 mainspace edits. The Gunny 380px-USMC-E7 svg 04:17, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • No though your a tolerable guy and all, I don't think you have the professional attitude I like to see in admins, though some joke more than other most know when to get serious, something I haven't seen much from you. Dont take it personally, but I don't like the way you act; not saying your immature, but I think you need to mature up a little, get more edits under your belt, and then try again.--Emiko~<3 06:49, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • No Are the edits there? Maybe, even though in my opinion they are rather basic ones. Is that attitude there? Absolutely not. "a good force in chat", I can definitely disagree, what with the fact that you just sit there and moan lots (mostly about how you can't be bothered to edit) and then don't bother to ban people when they've broken the rules multiple times. Couple all this with a poor attempt at an opening paragraph that was meant to convince me, you've got my 100% no vote. --DragonBorn96 09:59, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • No After examining your 'great progress' and actions throughout the months, and through your contributions, I can gladly throw in my 2 honest cents and with 200% confidence say..Hell. Fucking. No. Some of your contributions are note-worthy, but it also doesn't take a genius to look at the OTHER contributions listed and to see you obviously bull-shitted right through them, switching a few words around, adding a letter, or even deleting entire sub-articles only to add them back on. Now on chat, you obviously pull the moaning and groaning as DragonBorn stated, he basically took the words out of my mouth. You complain, you had a few incidents of letting trolls run amok, and just too laid back for a serious situation like this. Being an Admin is about taking problems and situations very seriously, not about being a 'fun awesome dude who can let me slip by a few rule-breakings'. Sure Admins and everyone alike know also when it's time to put the hat down and to relax and have fun with the other members of the wikia, basically knowing when to be mature at times, and when not to be. Overall:please Grow up in maturity and be serious about this.--Zerginfestor 10:53, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • No Well, you need to contribute more. It is soon. MS: Destiny conquers all.
  • No I don't think you took your duties seriously enough as a mod. Limmiegirl Lildeneb Talk! ♪ 15:11, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • No Agreed with Limmie. You know I love you bro, but I don't feel that you take your job seriously enough. The problem isn't a lack of responsibility, but rather a lack of passion for this place's upkeep and protection of its users. I think if you make a notable change in yourself, your attitude, and your edits in the next 2 months, you'll earn this position no sweat. -- Bacon-Man Talk to me goose! 15:23, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • No You're not ready by a long shot at the moment. I think that a lo of the edits you've made are 'bot' edits and are very minor but if you improve and apply again I think you'd have a better shot. Kiwi 3992205 15:25, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • No I'm sorry, but, not even kinda. I've seen you be supposedly 'active' in chat while people are posting things making it the hive of scum and villainy that it would be without great mods... and yet you were there. Plus, the thing about administration is that you absolutely, 100% have to keep opinions out of it. It is a professional working relationship, not a personal friendship. I have yet to once see you keep an opinion out of something, and thus, I cannot vote for you as an administrator with a good conscious. The Cyan Dragon 16:18, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • No Poor attitude, lack of professionalism, and edits aren't high enough in quality, quantity, frequency, or consistency for me to support you. Sorry. --Skire (talk) 16:19, May 1, 2012 (UTC)
  • No You hardly do anything in the chat. Sometimes you just watch it burn, and that's when you don't help with the burning. That should be clear enough i suppose. Happylice 19:17, May 1, 2012 (UTC)

Comments

Please be sure to leave me some constructive criticism down here because I know I need it! ToCxHawK

Advertisement