Forum:Fallout online by interplay sucks!!! we want bethesda!!!!
fallout 3 was such a great game; just perfect game i think if it was online game with the same graphic and small details it was a dream come true!!!
unfortunatly interplay got the rights for it... no tell me; how suck a poor and dead company can make a good fallout online game? i saw the project v13 screenshots it's look realy realy bad and iam not going to buy it; cant they just give the rights back to a perfect and succesful company like bethesda?!?! it's just such a spend quilaty for a dead company like interplay! fallout online must be made in the best way a mmorpg can be! and only bethesda got the possiblty to do that! to create a new generation of mmorpg! i want travel the woderful wasteland with the unbelievable graphic and meet some real players wondering around! i want ambush the super mutants with some real players! and everything in the same time that i see the best graphic ever that only bethesda can do! now please bethesda please take the rights back from this dead company and create the new generation of video games!!! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 126.96.36.199 (talk • contribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~!
what i want to know is who taught you to write english, because they need a slap in the head....
- Keep in mind that the screenshots are from an early, pre-alpha build, and a lot of art is likely just placeholders. If the game gets finished, they should look much better. Ausir(talk) 02:14, December 9, 2009 (UTC)
Who the heck wants a MMO fallout anyway, they will spend most of the bandwith on the game balance and connectivity, leaving a storyless grinder with average bland characters. Personaly I am SOOO happy Bethesda let it go!!! Bring on Fallout 4 with a option of multiplayer 1-4 players MAX!!! It would be easy to keep a good story line and side adventures, have replay out the wazzu, maybe even put in more random stuff and territory control factors (so you can make a gang) all kinds of stuff without all the MMO bullcrap. 188.8.131.52 15:23, June 1, 2011 (UTC)
FOOL has gotten its ass kicked by Fallen Earth that is why they said: They might not be able to make a FOOL game.
Honestly, after the farce that was the Fallout 3 story, I wouldn't trust Bethesda to write a childrens book. Obsidian on the other hand... Well, they could sell me a childrens book that they didn't write, claim it as their own work and I'd still buy 800 copies. 5t3v0 08:07, June 7, 2011 (UTC)
I think Bethesda did fine job on FO3's story. Everyone needs to stop being such damn fanboys. Pwndyoosucka 05:52, June 11, 2011 (UTC)
You can have the opinion that FO3 was a good game with a tense flowing storyline. You can also be of the opinion that Shinedown is the best new rock band of this generation and that horse shit smells like lilacs in spring. I am not of this opinion. Just look at Bethesda's catalogue. The main storylines are never very convincing and mostly fantasy cliched trophs. They do give the player a lot of freedom to imagine and create an interesting story with rping in mind set against their beautiful backdrops and the enriching history present in their games. But in all honesty Bethesda has no experience with online gameplay or online games. (sorry forgot about Brink but that's probably for the best) Besides Obsidian has a lot of developers from Interplay and BLack Isle (including some of the original developers that created the FO universe and first 2 games) I just think giving Bethesda the rights to create Any other FO game is seriously retarded, and taking away the rights from the original creators is just plain cruel.Cpanda 08:53, June 16, 2011 (UTC)