Forum:Joint adminship request: Kris and TrailerParkApe

From The Vault - Fallout Wiki
Jump to: navigation, search
Forums: Index > Wiki discussion > Joint adminship request: Kris and TrailerParkApe
 
Gametitle-Wiki.png
Gametitle-Wiki.png

Request[edit source]

Seeing how successful and timely it was for Spoon and Nitty, TrailerParkApe and I have decided to follow their footsteps. We are requesting our adminship, so we too, can enter The Vault.

Deadlykris[edit source]

It's like I put on my user page: I revert edits. I revert them often, for fun, but only as needed. I'm also a modder. I know my way around various modding tools, mainly the G.E.C.K. and Fallout 3 Edit (FO3Edit), which allows me to delve into the game files and extract the answer to questions or disputes regarding facts about Fallout 3 (and, once it's released and I get it, Fallout: New Vegas as well). I don't know the other games firsthand, but my spelling and grammar are impeccable, and my browser comes with a spell check to boot. My former job as a PC tech gave me some uber search engine skills allowing me to find just about anything if it's on the Internet somewhere.

TrailerParkApe[edit source]

When I came to The Vault, I thought I would help out minimally. Once being here I have helped a lot and I'm on this website on a regular basis. The Vault, as we all know, is a great source of information and doesn't need to be vandalized and have false information. I know a lot about Fallout 3, unfortunately I have not played the other Fallout games. Once, New Vegas comes out I will be playing that a lot and also helping here by adding information as well as deleting poor information. I am taking part in the lower casing project, so I am often making edits contributing to that and renaming pages. I am trying to expand my knowledge on the this wiki and I have done so by making continuous edits and by creating my own wiki with the help of Annonnimus. As Kris mentioned, my spelling too, is also sharp and I like to fix the grammar mistakes, and it's easy to spot some because my browser as well has spell check on it.

Contributions[edit source]

Kris:
Type of edits Edit count Type of edits Edit count
Article Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/Article Talk Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/Talk
User Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/User User talk Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/User talk
The Vault Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/The Vault The Vault talk Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/The Vault talk
File Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/File File talk Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/File talk
MediaWiki Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/MediaWiki MediaWiki talk Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/MediaWiki talk
Template Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/Template Template talk Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/Template talk
Help Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/Help Help talk Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/Help talk
Category Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/Category Category talk Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/Category talk
Forum Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/Forum Forum talk Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/Forum talk
Portal Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/Portal Portal talk Special:Editcount/Deadlykris/Portal talk
Total Special:Editcount/Deadlykris
Ape:
Type of edits Edit count Type of edits Edit count
Article Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/Article Talk Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/Talk
User Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/User User talk Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/User talk
The Vault Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/The Vault The Vault talk Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/The Vault talk
File Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/File File talk Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/File talk
MediaWiki Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/MediaWiki MediaWiki talk Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/MediaWiki talk
Template Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/Template Template talk Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/Template talk
Help Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/Help Help talk Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/Help talk
Category Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/Category Category talk Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/Category talk
Forum Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/Forum Forum talk Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/Forum talk
Portal Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/Portal Portal talk Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe/Portal talk
Total Special:Editcount/TrailerParkApe

In conclusion[edit source]

Like our predecessors in this joint adminship request concept, we just want to help the Vault as much as possible.

Votes[edit source]

Poll.png
Poll finished on August 22, 2010.
A consensus must be reached by voting before any action is taken.
  • While I'm rather miffed about the two of them stealing the cheeky idea that Spoony and I had, I can't help but heartily endorse the two when it comes down to it. Yes to both from me. :D Nitty Tok. 20:19, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes Why not. They work a lot, and pretty much deserve the admin tools. Nukey74.69.233.198 01:49, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes Fryingpan57 let ape into the vault,chris can burn in the nuclear holocost for all I care.
  • Yes I don't know how many admins we need, but TrailerParkApe and Deadlykris are fully qualified for the position and I know they'll do a good job. I say Yes to both of them :) --Anon talk 20:30, August 15, 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes Keep up the good work, guys. Ghouly89 (Talk) 03:11, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes I've never seen either of you do anything that would hinder becoming an admin. - RASICTalk 03:14, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes Sure, I think you guys should be admins, but trailerpark you need to improve on making news blogs. Shadowrunner56 18:21, August 16, 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes I approve of both of ye. I've seen lots of good edits from you guys :) Metalspork (word vomit) 04:55, August 17, 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes These two guys are workhorses. They continue to learn new things at a quick pace. I say, let them be admins.-- Gothemasticator 01:36, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Yesdefinately they deserve it there all ways helping so yes from me Gaelan talk 02:21, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes Why not? They're always here practically every day and seem to know what they're doing. I haven't been here that long but from what can I tell they are among the biggest contributors so they should make good adminss, as long as they keep up the good work and continue learning of course... Count me as a thumbs up. -MuzRat 04:50, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes Mmm... Beer. MFToast - talk 05:42, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes You guys are awesome and you definetely have my vote.Shadow 19:20, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes I'm all for Ape but I haven't seen Kris much. Must be time differences. Matt of the wastes
  • Yes Wunengzi
  • Yes Haven't seen much of Kris either but I've seen Ape been being pretty helpful around on the wiki so yes... Insane! 05:19, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes I typically agree with them reverting my edits, and they are not as pompous as some wiki admins. I like that immensely, admins should be friendly even when disagreeing with you instead of using the "Because I said so" routine (unless it's absolutely necesarry). This place feels as friendly as the Dragon Age wiki and alot of it is Kris, and Ape. Mictlantecuhtli 12:45, August 20, 2010 (UTC)
  • Yes I've seen both of their names many times and their statistics are good. Why wouldn't you vote for them? —Preceding unsigned comment added by Jstarsupreme (talkcontribs). Please sign your posts with ~~~~!
  • Yes I definetley think these guys deserve adminship they keep a constant watch over the forum and check the facts constantly to keep articles up to date. They have my Vote. -bleep196- 01:25, August 21, 2010 (UTC)

Comments[edit source]

  • (No) They are fine where they are now. The last thing this page needs is them 2 throwing their weight around. Yes they are both excellent with grammar but they lack the people skills and judgement calls that admins should have. They don't deserve it, well at least not yet they have alot to learn about humility and sometimes they gotta not be so uptight. My 3 mates all agree. Its an allround no from us. 58.172.48.232 13:58, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
    I doubt the validity of 'your three mates'. :/
    I fail to see any things that connect with 'gotta not be so uptight'. Nitty Tok. 23:53, August 18, 2010 (UTC)
    Please be aware that unregistered users cannot vote, as that would open the door to skewing poll results. That said, anons are more than welcome to voice their opinion. -- Porter21 (talk) 09:00, August 19, 2010 (UTC)
  • (Yes) Absolutely. They look good, and I think they'll do some good for it. 173.168.207.99
  • No I don't think that they would countribute beneficially to the project. Currently they're like "watchdogs" - in a bad sense 62.80.150.225 10:56, August 23, 2010 (UTC)
  • Are they admins now? They have the votes and the poll has expired. - RASICTalk 01:04, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
    Yes, they are admins now. Congratulations! Ausir(talk) 06:35, August 24, 2010 (UTC)
    Congrats ;) -- Porter21 (talk) 06:44, August 24, 2010 (UTC)